The Carmelite Library closes
on Friday the 11th of December.
The Library
re-opens on Wednesday the
3rd of February 2021 at nine in the morning.
The Carmelite Library closes
on Friday the 11th of December.
The Library
re-opens on Wednesday the
3rd of February 2021 at nine in the morning.
The Carmelite Library
Visiting Procedures
In November and December, the Library is open each week on Wednesday and Friday, 9 am to 5 pm. The Library closes for the summer break on Friday the 11th of December at 5 pm.
Circulation
There are two forms of circulation:
1. Browse and Borrow circulation. Visit and loan out items following the procedures below.
2. Request and Collect circulation. Email your requests to librarian@carmelitelibrary.org and collect the items at the side door during opening hours.
Entry to the Library
In keeping with practice across
Melbourne, the Library limits the number of
visitors at any one time. 10 is the maximum capacity at all times; this total
includes staff and visitors. Entrance is via the side door of the Library, not
the main entrance. For now, this is the only entrance point to the Library.
By entering you agree to:
You will not be permitted to enter if:
Book Returns
Books are returned in the Returns Box in the foyer of the side entrance, or on the designated table in the Library itself. Returned books are quarantined for three days. There is no urgency to return existing loans, though it is asked that they be returned before Christmas.
Use of the Library Space
The
Library is not currently available for study. Visitors are asked to limit
visits to 20 minutes for browsing, borrowing and enquiries only. No booking is
required to visit the Library.
Please be patient as we welcome people back into the Carmelite Library space. You may experience wait times as the staff manage the new ways in which we must operate.
The Carmelite Library re-opens on Wednesday the 18th of November. The new hours are Wednesday 9 am-5 pm and Friday 9 am-5 pm.
On Tuesday the 20th of October, Brian Harold conducted a Spiritual Reading Group via zoom on the life and spirituality of St John Henry Newman. Here is Brian’s paper, interspersed with selected quotes.
John Henry Newman was born in London in 1801 to a
prosperous family and was the eldest of six children. His religious upbringing
was as a conventional Bible-based evangelical member of the Church of England.
A brilliant student at school, Newman at 15 experienced
what he was to describe as a profound religious conversion.
He said, of the experience, ‘I came to rest in the
thought of two and two only absolute and luminously self-evident beings, myself
and my Creator.ʼ In other words, were he to doubt everything else, he was
convinced of his own existence and of the existence of God. In his long life he
was never to deviate from that belief.
So intellectually advanced was he, John Henry was
accepted for a place with a scholarship at Trinity College, Oxford, when only
16. Influenced by his lecturers and fellow students, his religious views began
to develop away from his early evangelicalism. His close friend and
contemporary Hurrell Froude, who could be described as Anglo-Catholic, urged
him to read the Early Fathers of the Church - Saints Athanasius, John
Chrysostom, Basil, Gregory of Nyssa, and the early Church Councils. This study
had a profound effect on Newman’s spiritual progress.
John Keble, a revered figure at Oxford, was
concerned to lead the Anglican Church away from what he saw as ‘its evangelical
complacency to a greater emphasis on the spirituality, theology, and
sacramental life of the early Christian Churchʼ.
In 1822, Newman was made a Fellow of Oriel College,
a much-prized appointment.
In 1825, he was ordained priest of the Church of
England.
In 1828, he became Vicar of St. Maryʼs Church in
Oxford.
His preaching there became legendary. The colleges
would empty on Sunday afternoons to crowd into the church to hear sermons which
could last up to more than half an hour.
Many years later Matthew Arnold wrote of his memory
of those sermons: “The charm of that spiritual apparition, gliding in the dim
afternoon light through the aisles of St Maryʼs, rising in the pulpit, and then
in the most entrancing of voices, breaking the silence with words and thoughts
which were a religious music. The sweetness of the voice, low and soft, but
also ‘piercingʼ and ‘thrillingʼ.”
In 1832, Newman joined Hurrell Froude and Froudeʼs
father an Anglican Archdeacon, on a Mediterranean tour. They visited Malta,
Sicily, Naples, and finally Rome. It was his first experience of seeing the
Roman Catholic Church in operation, as it were. He wrote home to his mother
that this first-hand taste of the ‘Popish Church of the Antichrist’ distressed
and puzzled him. He said his imagination and his heart had been touched by what
he had seen but his reason had not been affected at all. The Roman Church still
upheld a “polytheistic, degrading, idolatrous religion.”
Newman decided to return from Rome to Sicily rather
than return to England with the Froudes. While there he came down with a severe
dose of typhoid fever. Although not superstitious, he did see it as retribution
for what he said was his wilfulness and ingratitude to his friends.
On recovery he felt newly energised. He declared
that ‘I have work to do in England. God has a special place for meʼ.
On the voyage home he wrote the poem The Pillar of
the Cloud later to became a popular hymn.
“Lead Kindly Light, amid the encircling gloom,
Lead Thou me on, the night is dark and I am far from home,
Lead Thou me on,
Keep Thou my feet; I do not ask to see
The distant scene, - one step enough for me.” (and so on)
Later in the 1860s, he was to write the epic poem
The Dream of Gerontius - ‘Firmly I believe and truly, God is three and God is
oneʼ - set to music as an oratorio by Edward Elgar in 1900.
Shortly after Newmanʼs return to Oxford, John Keble
preached a sermon which criticised the prevailing secularism and the growing
indifference to religious faith. It proved to be the springboard for the
so-called ‘Oxford Movementʼ, which was in essence a religious revival with
holiness of life as paramount.
Two months later Newman published the first three
of the Tracts for the Time,s as they came to be known. Over the next eight
years the Tractarians, spearheaded by Newman, were to publish 90 of them. In
two of them, published in 1838, Newman argued for what he called the Via Media,
a proposition whereby the Anglican Church was situated between a truly
historical Catholic Church and the Protestant Reformers.
The Via Media was free of Roman excesses such as
the centralised, overweening authority of the Pope, overdone devotion, even
adoration of the Virgin Mary, the cult of the Saints, Transubstantiation,
Purgatory, etc. The centuries-old standard objections.
Yet, within only two years, he came to see that
this Via Media had never existed in the historical Church. He called it a
‘paper theoryʼ only. By his continued reading of the Early Fathers and St
Augustine he was able to say that ‘the theory of the Via Media was absolutely
pulverisedʼ.
Newman was becoming increasingly convinced that
Rome possessed the fullness of truth, yet was unable to bring his loyalties and
emotions into accord with his intellect. In the final Tract 90, he argued that
subscription to the 39 Articles of the Church of England was compatible with
holding Roman Catholic doctrines like the real presence of Christ in the bread
and wine of the Eucharist, or prayer for the dead.
This met with hostile rejection not only from
clergy but many in the general population as well. Newman gave up active
ministry and retreated to Littlemore, a village near Oxford, part of St Maryʼs
parish, where he had restored the church and built a lovely chapel. There, he
and a small band of followers, lived a quasi-monastic life of prayer, fasting
and reflection.
In October 1845, Newman finally recognised where
his logic had long since led him and he was received into the Roman Catholic
Church.
The next year, 1847, Newman accompanied by his
fellow Anglican convert Ambrose St John went to Rome to be trained for the
Catholic priesthood. After only eight months he was ordained. Much of the time
he and Ambrose skipped lectures, preferring to take in the sights and churches
of Rome. After all, there wasnʼt much to teach him that he didnʼt know already.
He decided to join the Oratorians, a society of
diocesan priests founded in the 16th century in Rome by St Philip Neri. They
live in common, follow a Rule, but do not take vows and are allowed their own
money and possessions.
He was asked by the Pope to set up Oratories in
London and Birmingham with him as Superior and Rector of both. He chose to live
in Birmingham, preferring the quieter city to London where he imagined too many
public demands would be made of him.
In 1851, he was invited by the Archbishop of Dublin
to found a Catholic university in that city. He was to spend seven years going
backwards and forwards between Dublin and Birmingham. It proved a fruitless
task, as Newmanʼs ideas of what higher education should aspire to did not match
the narrower vision of the Irish bishops. They wanted a kind of Catholic
college with no mixing with Protestants.
Back in Birmingham, Newman, encouraged by his
bishop, Bernard Ullathorne, bought land in Oxford for a church and a house,
there hoping to set up an Oratorian mission. However, this came to nothing
also. The English bishops and the Vatican opposed his plans fearing that the
environment of Oxford was not suitable for young Catholic men. They might be
corrupted.
In 1856, the London Oratory successfully appealed
to Rome to have Newman removed as Rector. His theology was not Roman centred
enough for them.
In 1859, Newman published an article titled ‘On
Consulting the Laity in Matters of Doctrineʼ. It caused an uproar in church
circles in England and Rome. In it he argued that apostolic tradition expresses
itself in various times through different means - sometimes through the
hierarchy, sometimes by theologians, sometimes through the people, sometimes
through the liturgy or through customs or movements thrown up by particular
historical moments. Consequently, he wrote, the body of the faithful is one of
the witnesses to the tradition of revealed doctrine, and their consensus
throughout Christian history is the voice of the infallible church.
Newman wrote: “I want a laity, not arrogant, not rash in
speech, not disputatious, but men who know their religion, who enter into it, who
know just where they stand, who know what they hold, and what they do not, who
know their creed so well that they can give an account of it, who know so much
of history that they can defend it”.
His writings were anathema in the Church of Pope Pius
the 9th, Pio Nono. Even his own Bishop, Bernard Ullathorne, asked him ‘Who is
the Laity?ʼ Newman replied that ‘the Church would look funny without themʼ.
Henry Manning, soon to be the next Archbishop of
Westminster, in denying Newmanʼs hopes for an Oxford foundation, declared that
it was inadvisable for the laity to be better educated than their priests.
Later, Manning forbade Catholics to attend Oxford and Cambridge universities.
Newman continued to be unappreciated and even
vilified in Catholic circles. He had lost the friendship of so many of his old
Oxford friends and was estranged from his own family. One of his dear sisters
never spoke to him again after his conversion. His other sister did not
communicate again for nearly 20 years.
He remarked to a friend in 1863: ‘As a Protestant,
I felt my religion dreary, not my life - but as a Catholic, my life dreary, not
my religion. ʼ
This was a low time for him. His writings were
being seriously misunderstood. He was under great suspicion at the Vatican and
was not supported by many of the English hierarchy.
However, Newmanʼs fortunes were to change for the
better. He was accused in a newspaper article by the author and clergyman Charles
Kingsley of being indifferent to the truth. He wrote ‘Truth, for its own sake,
had never been a virtue with the Roman clergyʼ.
Newman replied with an account of his entire
spiritual journey to Catholicism. Published with the Latin title ‘Apologia Pro
Vita Suaʼ, it proved an instant success.
Eamon Duffy has written: ‘It proved to be a triumph
of self-vindication, one of the most persuasive portrayals of mind and heart in
movement in English or in any other languageʼ.
Catholics hailed him as a brilliant apologist who
presented their unpopular religion in a new and sympathetic light. And
Anglicans remembered that he had transformed the Established Church for the
better. Old and dear friends from the Oxford days sought him out again. It was
hailed in the secular press as a classic.
In 1868, Newman gave permission for thousands of
his Anglican sermons to be gathered together and published. He was happy to
write a Preface for the edition. Only slight amendments were made with some
deletion of terms as ‘Poperyʼ and ‘Papistryʼ. The sales of these sermons and
the earlier Apologia were phenomenal and gave Newman financial security for the
rest of his life.
In 1873, his various writings on higher education
were gathered into one book and published as ‘The Idea of a Universityʼ which
became almost at once a classic and has remained the most widely read of all
his works, endlessly reprinted and cited in every discussion of the nature and
purpose of higher education.
In 1875, his dear friend Fr Ambrose St John died. His
regular companion on visits to Rome and on occasional holiday trips. Ambrose,
unlike Newman, was a good linguist and was indispensable when they were away
from England. Another Oratorian priest William Neville became his guide and
companion for the last 15 years of his life.
In 1877, Newman was delighted to be elected as the
First Honorary Fellow of Trinity College, Oxford. His old undergraduate
college. He enjoyed renewing old acquaintances there and also visited
Littlemore where he was enthusiastically greeted by many of the older
parishioners.
In 1879, the new Pope Leo the 13th removed all
doubt that might exist about Newmanʼs orthodoxy by creating him Cardinal.
Newman asked not to have to attend Rome for the ceremony, pleading frailty.
Henry Manning, made Cardinal in 1875 and Archbishop of Westminster, somehow
misinterpreted Newmanʼs request as a refusal, which he passed on to the
Vatican. However, Newmanʼs supporting Bishop, Bernard Ullathorne, sorted out
the problem and Newman received his red hat to wide acclaim throughout England.
He did visit Rome at a later date and was made most
welcome by the Pope. His last decade was passed in relative serenity free of
the controversies and restrictions which has marked his earlier life. He died
in 1890. Crowds lined the Birmingham streets in homage as the cortège passed.
Victorian England had got used to Roman Catholics living in their midst and
Newman had played no small part in that acceptance.
Part 2
In this presentation I have chosen a few crucial
quotes that I believe capture some of Newmanʼs seminal ideas. Itʼs just a
selection and by no means comprehensive of his writings.
A strong theme that emerges in his extensive body
of work is that Newman was an ardent believer in dogma, Christian revealed
truth’ he was equally ardently opposed to dogmatism. Dogmatic declarations give
rise to the “mischievous fanaticism of those who imagine that they can explain
the sublime doctrines and exuberant promises of the Gospel, before they have
yet to know themselves and to discern the holiness of God”.
Another theme central to Newmanʼs ideas was the
notion of the heart as a way of understanding beliefs. For example, he believed
that “the heart is commonly reached, not through the reason, but through the
imagination, by means of direct impressions, by the testimony of facts and
events, by history, by description. Persons influence us, voices melt us, looks
subdue us, deeds inflame us.”
He wrote: “With our Saviour’s pattern before me, the best
preparation for loving the world at large, and loving it duly and wisely, is to
cultivate an intimate friendship and affection towards those who are immediately
about us”.
When Newman, was made a Cardinal he choose as his
motto “ Cor ad cor Loquitor”: Heart speaks to heart.
Newman was much concerned with bringing people to a
real assent, where the heart of a human being was open to the mysterious
activity of the Holy Spirit. Moreover, Newman was a passionate believer in the
objectivity of Christian truths and the obligation of the Catholic Church to
declare and interpret it.
Newman once observed that there were “Saints who are
only made more eloquent, more poetical, more profound, more intellectual, by
reason of their being more holy.”
It was one of Newmanʼs deepest held convictions
that to cling to the literal letter of the past was to lose its essential
spirit, and therefore to betray it.
Other key lines of thought are
found in these concluding quotes from Newman’s works:
“In a higher world it is otherwise, but here
below to live is to change, and to be perfect is to have changed often”.
“Man is not a reasoning animal; he is a seeing,
feeling, contemplating, acting animal. Conscience, as the voice of God, is key;
and yet religion without dogma slides inexorably into mere sentiment”.
“It is not good for a Pope to live 20
years. It is an anomaly and bears no good fruit; he becomes a God, and
has no one to contradict him, does not know facts, and does cruel things
without meaning it. Will not the next century demand Popes who are not
Italians?”
“I have no tendency to be a saint. Saints are
not literary men, they do not love the classics, they do not write tales.
We read, we are affected, softened, or roused, and that is all”.
Sources
‘John Henry
Newman - A Biography’ by Ian Ker
‘Newman and his age’ by Sheridan Gilley
‘John Henry Newman - A Mind Alive’ by Roderick Strange
‘John Henry Newman - of Developing Spirituality’ by Austin Cooper
‘John Henry Newman - A very brief history’ by Eamon Duffy
Noah takes some measurements
240 wood engravings copied from the work of the German painter Julius Schnorr von Carolsfeld (1794-1872). (Paris & Leipzig, 1860) Notes: Schnorr was a member of the Nazarene School, a Romantic reaction to neo-classicism, its aim to revive the spiritual in pictorial art. ‘Nazarene’ was a term of derision used by the school’s critics who scorned the Bible picture clichés of flowing hair and flowing robes. They were Pre-Raphaelites before the Pre-Raphaelites, having an important influence on that English school of art. The Nazarenes had dispersed by the time Rossetti & Co. got to work, and one cannot help feeling that Schorr had subsequently gone over to the neo-classical dark side by the time some of these works were made. Others discern a post-Raphaelite floridity, typical of the late Renaissance. A scanty record for this bulk load is available at the Bibliothèque nationale de France, Notice No. : FRBNF40360702, scanty especially in regard to the team of artists who made the woodcuts from the Schnorr originals. Cataloguers steady themselves at this point to ask the main question: who are the people primarily responsible for this big time picture book, Julius Schnorr von Carolsfeld, or his copyists? Names do not leap instantly from the page, only obscure initials in corners against the placename Dresden.
And so, colleagues, here we are on the final day of our bibliographical multi-omnibus circumnavigation of the world. Time is eternal, especially in India, so it’s okay if we are a few minutes late today.
The Ministry of Culture of the Indian Government maintains the National Mission for Manuscripts, an autonomous organisation established to survey, locate and conserve Indian manuscripts. The Mission runs 32 conservation units across India, one of them being the razzle-dazzle Raza Library in the city of Rampur in Uttar Pradesh. Hence the Library’s amazing website, which you could spend a lot of time browsing: http://razalibrary.gov.in/
Time is of the essence. This is why in 1975 this grand library, which had fallen into some disrepair, was taken over by the government. Quote: “It contains very rare and valuable collections of manuscripts, historical documents, specimens of Islamic calligraphy, miniature paintings, astronomical instruments and rare illustrated works in Arabic and Persian languages besides 60,000 printed books.”
It has been difficult finding a guide who speaks English. Sometimes a picture paints a thousand words. If we split up into two groups, half of you can go here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DQZnwjfHsFs
Rampur Raza has been, ever since its foundation in 1774, a treasure house of Indo-Islamic culture, its patrons the successive Nawabs of Rampur. Since 1957 the collection has been housed within Hamid Manzil, a fort designed by W.C. Wright during the Raj. Wright’s architecture synthesizes elements from Islamic, Hindu and Victorian Gothic in a style known as ‘Indo-Saracenic’. You can’t miss it.
Sometimes music speaks louder than words. The other half can go here and we’ll see each other anon: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O8FANf5beoM
Awesome! But time now to go out for Indian. It would be great to sit down with everyone, crack a poppadom or two together, share reflections on round-the-world-in-twelve-days. As it is, I cannot even go to our favourite Café Saffron in Upper Heidelberg Road because it’s outside the five-kilometre radius for Melburnians in Stage Four Lockdown. It may be time instead just to prepare an old favourite at home from Madhur Jaffrey.
Whatever, until such time as we meet again over dinner, or zoom even, I hope you enjoyed the tour. Stay safe, stay at home, enjoy a steaming cup of milky chai, and talk to anyone who needs your words.
Philip Harvey
Tour Guide
Today we visit Ningbo, one of China’s oldest cities (circa 4800
BC), home to China’s oldest library (founded in 1561). The One Sky Pavilion, or
Tianyi Ge Library, was constructed according to Taoist principles based on the
Book of Changes, which is why in Chinese the name is also sometimes translated as
The Universal Union Pavilion.
When we read the English
Sinologist Arthur Waley, his account of ancient dynastic and province wars is
that one of the first things they did was burn down the library of their enemy.
This is why they are hard to find on Google. Tianyi Ge’s wiki, well worth
reading, includes the following ‘fun fact’, “The
walls were specially constructed to prevent fire.”
Tianyi Ge held 70,000 books at its height. It was established by the Emperor. The collection became depleted over the centuries due to theft and neglect. The British helped themselves to many of the manuscripts. Restoration really coincided with the opening up of China in the nineties and the government’s policies of celebrating the country’s ancient heritage.
Throughout our visit to the oldest library in China, we have been visiting beautiful libraries of modern China. Each film is about five quality minutes long. It’s time to thank Leslie Montgomery who pieced together this wonderful alternative tour online.
The Great Libraries of China - Part 5 | Tianjin Binhai Library: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EI_rN2HTyRE
Philip
Harvey
Tour
Guide
We visit a contemporary 24/7 Japanese library to ponder a world without libraries, which was more or less the case in Japan before its fabled insularity ended after 1853. It is a fact worthy of reflection that the country’s oldest library is the Imperial Library, opened in 1872. In other words, technically speaking this means there are no ancient libraries in Japan. Libraries, in Japanese ‘toshokan’, are a product of Westernisation. Your guide’s own reading of this is that before the mid-19th century ‘toshokan’ were largely private collections of scrolls and other written materials, literally in-house repositories, a view borne out by reading classical Japanese literature. Doubtless, households and individuals would have had their own collections, storerooms for reading, but the concept of organising and saving works for general use does not appear to have had any kind of widespread cultural hold. Perhaps those with a better knowledge of this aspect of Japanese history could enlighten us further. The best picture of where we are today can be seen here: https://www.jla.or.jp/portals/0/html/libraries-e.html
Your guide is also fascinated by the recent discovery that Zen monasteries don't have libraries. They have repositories for sutras, i.e. liturgical rites as we would say, but if you want to read a book you have to go outside the monastery. Is a repository a library? Or is that why we have different words? I recently wrote a reflection on this discovery, after reading an interview with the American poet Gary Snyder: http://thecarmelitelibrary.blogspot.com/search/label/Gary%20Snyder
Also, this thorough
summary of life in a Japanese monastery is significant, again, for what it
doesn’t talk about, i.e. any presence of a ‘toshokan’:
Visitors
who would rather see a library on a library tour, than no libraries, are
welcome to go here (you have 22 minutes, starting Now!): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yNo7xnI-bwY
Philip
Harvey
Tour
Guide