Original
photograph: Large room of the ‘Escher x nendo’ show called ‘Between Two Worlds’,
held between December 2018 and April 2019 at the National Gallery of Victoria.
We were introduced to different types of long-serving Wikipedians. For example, there is the man with a bee in his bonnet about the use of ‘comprise’. He has warrant. H. W. Fowler himself says the “lamentably common use of ‘comprise’ as a synonym of ‘compose’ or ‘constitute’ is a wanton and indefensible weakening of our vocabulary.” Our editor spends days correcting wrong sentence constructions put together by hapless Wikipedians who seem not to know if ‘comprise’ refers to the whole or parts of something. Some would describe his behaviour as helpful, others as quixotic. This kind of personal mission though is not why any of us were at the zoom class, even if we’re sticklers for grammar.
We were told that the editorial essentials comprise the following: it is an online encyclopedia; entries have a neutral point of view and are factual; the content is free; it does not have firm rules; and Wikipedians interact in a respectful and civil manner. This last point might be assumed, but as the internet lacks rules of etiquette, may be necessary. For every impeccable compiler of comprehensive facts on the given subject, we could encounter a sensitivity reader, blinkered historian, (Oxford comma) or vengeful cousin of the subject. Everything in entries must be suitable for the public domain (no copyright), so must be suitably rewritten; everything is referenced.
All
of that sounds simple enough. The hard anonymous work begins collecting material
on the subject of our entry. This includes, but doesn’t comprise, the
aforementioned ‘scraping’. Those of us used to this being what corrupt
ex-presidents do with the bottom of the barrel, must adjust to its meaning as
the extraction of vast masses of data on websites and copying into other documents
and spreadsheets. We gaze at the prospect of ‘scraping’ for a living, even
though the work is voluntary, with results that comprise but a formal fraction
of the facts ‘scraped’. It dawned on us why the 19,000 articles devised in the
first year of Wikipedia (2001), have increased to 6 million by February of this
year. After one hour, armed with our own password, we could thus commence our
verbal re-arrangement of reality. If we are not side-tracked by our firm belief
in the Oxford comma, and the compulsion to add it to every article not currently
correct in that respect.