A
solidly bound album of sepia photographs of Rome, place, maker, and date
unknown. Notes: This delightful book is a pleasurable challenge for the cataloguer,
being a set of images only, with no self-defining text or additional apparatus to
help explain its existence. The most arresting initial effect of the
photographs is the lack of people. They look like period pictures of the very
scenes we are seeing today online: empty St. Peter’s Square, empty Pantheon, empty
Colosseum, empty Appian Way. Those knowledgeable in Victorian photography may
have explanations for how large cityscapes could be so absent of people in
broad daylight. Did the photographers wait till the crowds dispersed? Was it
always this quiet outside feast and market days? Was everyone inside and not
about to go out? Well anyway, to work. First, place. The red cover suggests the
book may have been a sale item for a gentleman on the grand tour or clergyman
ad limina. On the other hand, it may have been custom-made almost anywhere. The
maker? This is two questions really: who made the book? who took the
photographs? The photographs are good prints mounted on hard card. None are signed
by a studio or a photographer, but they are quality productions. So far,
searches to match pictures with online Google Images, or in books, have been to
no avail. Even then, it could be a coterie of cameramen, not just one. I’m
keeping on the lookout, even after the bibliographical record is complete. Whoever
constructed the book knew about tape binding, cardboard spacing, signature
tying, photo mounting, and other skills known only to a bookbinder. My
conviction is Anonymous. Date? Several of the photographs have faded captions in
French explaining the views for sightseers. This is help only insofar as it
means the pictures may have been cut from a French album, not that the originals
are French. We need an expert in 19th century Rome graphic and civic
history to date the photographs, if not the book containing them. My less than
thorough analysis tells me that similar Roman images suggest they were taken any
time immediately prior to the First Vatican Council (1869-70) until say into
the 1890s. The Notes Field (Marc Tag 500) is bigger than the rest of the
record.
A favourite view of fishermen beside the Tiber with the Fisherman's House in the background. Our problem, same view, different day.To the right and in need of a scrub, the Mausoleum of Hadrian.
The Spanish Steps: Vuoto! The marquees in the piazza are a clue, but what of?
The Claudian Aqueduct according to our red book and (above) according to Joel Sternfeld in his 'Campagna Romana : the countryside of ancient Rome' (Knopf, 1992)
No comments:
Post a Comment